Begin to listen to Americas last real presidet John F Kennedys speech. Then listen in to the second link "Secret Mysteries of Americas Beginning" in all it's part. As we all know Kennedy was brutally murdered and this covered up by means possibly only by people with real insight, knowledge and power. Finally listen to the genius comedian Bill Hicks that sums all of this up pretty well.
President John F Kennedy Secret Society Speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces
Secret Mysteries Of America s Beginnings
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5loYlDP8dvI&feature=related
Bill Hicks: "I'M SO GLAD WE ARE FREE"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs-nHQYY6Fg&feature=related
fredag 30 april 2010
All that’s left
As always very relevant insights by Mr Rubin.It's now claimed by some the oils spill from this disaster can be up to some 5.000 bpd at the moment. Then and as the emergency lock 1,900 meters below the surface securing that no oil is coming out from the well is not working the only possible means of stopping this disaster is by placing a huge metal cylinder over the well. This is a tested method that has worked earlier. Only problem is that newer before on these debts only at shallow waters. Imagine doing this type of rescue work at the debts. First issue is that the cap will not be at hand within four weeks. That’s then four weeks of oil spill equivalent of up to even 5.000 bpd. Then in this contexts it's hard to argue that Tars sand should even be remotely as environmental unfriendly as of shore deep sea oil drilling. In fact in the tars sand you have oil polluted dirt and sand. By using e.g. in-situ methods the oil is the removed from the ground and what is left is an improved environment than will be able to heal itself after some years. That's for sure harder to say relevant to this massive oil spill in the Gulf.
America’s dream of greater energy independence is rapidly turning into an ecological nightmare. Instead of filling empty gas tanks, BP’s Deepwater Horizon well miles offshore is oozing thousands of barrels a day of oil, already covering an area over 1,900 square miles in the food-rich waters of the Gulf of Mexico. With no way of shutting off the valve, which is now buried 1,900 meters below the sea, a $2 billion seafood industry is threatened, not to mention the billions more in damage to coastal real estate values and the potential devastation to wetlands and the wildlife they contain if the growing slick washes ashore.
Most forms of unconventional oil and gas (including, by the way, shale gas) are invariably very hard on the environment. Although tar sands production draws most of the world’s criticism, we are quickly discovering that deep-water wells and the pressure surges they engender run the risk of wreaking even greater ecological and environmental devastation.
And the deeper that technology allows us to drill miles below the ocean floor, the greater the risk that we will see more and more of these disasters. If this week has shown us the pressure surge of wells a mile below the ocean floor, what are the prospects of our standing up to those we’ll encounter in newly discovered Gulf of Mexico fields like BP’s Tiber one, six miles below the ocean floor?
Of course, devastating leaks haven’t been the only thing to thwart America’s efforts to boost its oil production in the Gulf. Five years ago, Hurricane Katrina and the other Category 3 to 5 storms that hit the region devastated its oil industry. Instead of doubling production levels, as once confidently forecast by the US Department of Energy, production got hammered. In fact, it’s only very recently returned to pre-Katrina levels, only now to face an entirely different setback.
Why is this so potentially devastating to America’s oil future? The Gulf of Mexico was the only area of the country where there was any reasonable hope of expanding domestic supply. Production in the lower 48 states peaked in the early 1970s, as predicted by the American geophysicist King Hubbert back in 1956. And despite the enthusiasm of the “drill, baby, drill” lobby to do more in Alaska, that state’s oil production has been depleting even faster than in the rest of the country. As a result, a country that once produced ten million barrels a day is now barely able to produce half that amount.
If you’re wondering why we’re risking catastrophic environmental consequences by drilling wells miles below the ocean floor, the answer is simple enough. It’s the same answer to the question of why we’re pouring billions of dollars into the tar sands.
It’s all that’s left.
http://www.jeffrubinssmallerworld.com/2010/04/28/all-thats-left/
America’s dream of greater energy independence is rapidly turning into an ecological nightmare. Instead of filling empty gas tanks, BP’s Deepwater Horizon well miles offshore is oozing thousands of barrels a day of oil, already covering an area over 1,900 square miles in the food-rich waters of the Gulf of Mexico. With no way of shutting off the valve, which is now buried 1,900 meters below the sea, a $2 billion seafood industry is threatened, not to mention the billions more in damage to coastal real estate values and the potential devastation to wetlands and the wildlife they contain if the growing slick washes ashore.
Most forms of unconventional oil and gas (including, by the way, shale gas) are invariably very hard on the environment. Although tar sands production draws most of the world’s criticism, we are quickly discovering that deep-water wells and the pressure surges they engender run the risk of wreaking even greater ecological and environmental devastation.
And the deeper that technology allows us to drill miles below the ocean floor, the greater the risk that we will see more and more of these disasters. If this week has shown us the pressure surge of wells a mile below the ocean floor, what are the prospects of our standing up to those we’ll encounter in newly discovered Gulf of Mexico fields like BP’s Tiber one, six miles below the ocean floor?
Of course, devastating leaks haven’t been the only thing to thwart America’s efforts to boost its oil production in the Gulf. Five years ago, Hurricane Katrina and the other Category 3 to 5 storms that hit the region devastated its oil industry. Instead of doubling production levels, as once confidently forecast by the US Department of Energy, production got hammered. In fact, it’s only very recently returned to pre-Katrina levels, only now to face an entirely different setback.
Why is this so potentially devastating to America’s oil future? The Gulf of Mexico was the only area of the country where there was any reasonable hope of expanding domestic supply. Production in the lower 48 states peaked in the early 1970s, as predicted by the American geophysicist King Hubbert back in 1956. And despite the enthusiasm of the “drill, baby, drill” lobby to do more in Alaska, that state’s oil production has been depleting even faster than in the rest of the country. As a result, a country that once produced ten million barrels a day is now barely able to produce half that amount.
If you’re wondering why we’re risking catastrophic environmental consequences by drilling wells miles below the ocean floor, the answer is simple enough. It’s the same answer to the question of why we’re pouring billions of dollars into the tar sands.
It’s all that’s left.
http://www.jeffrubinssmallerworld.com/2010/04/28/all-thats-left/
torsdag 29 april 2010
Vad är det eg som pågår nu bakom kulisserna?
The men behind Barack Obama
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MouUJNG8f2k&feature=related
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-KJCMWcoms&feature=related
Zbigniew Brzezinski, tidigare Jimmy Carters National Security Advisor och tillsammans med David Rockefeller grundare av den sk Trilateral Commission har vi talat om tidigare är idag den verkliga makten bakom USAs nye president Obama.
Brzezinski representerar intressen som strävar efter att införa en ny världsordning där en centraliserad administration, en centralbank, en världs valuta och globalt ledarskap är kopplat till ett informations system där alla världsmedborgare är sammanlänkade mha informations teknik (RFID) till ett globalt informations system.
Låter detta som total nonsens? Konspiratoriska fantasier lätta att helt avfärda? Läs då Brzezinskis bok från 1980:
Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era
http://www.amazon.com/Between-Two-Ages-Americas-Technetronic/dp/0313234981
där han bla skriver följande:
”The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."
Ett annat citat man hittar I samma bok som alltså skrevs nu mer än 30 år sedan:
”Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.”
Och här en presentation där en annan av Brezinkys böcker "The Grand Chessboard" diskuteras:
Mike Ruppert discusses Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard
http://www.videosift.com/video/Ruppert-talk-on-Brzezinskis-The-Grand-Chessboard
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives (Paperback)by Zbigniew Brzezinski
http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Chessboard-American-Geostrategic-Imperatives/dp/0465027261/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1236020265&sr=1-2
Och notera att när Brzezinski talar om "behovet" av ett nytt Pearl Harbour så kanske de flesta tänker i termer av militära aktioner eller terror attentat. Men det går natuligtvis lika bra med finansiella instrument. Se här vilken skada man kan åstakomma med helt oreglerade derivat och vilken politisk röra som blir konsekvensen. "Order out of caos"?
Taibbi: The Lunatics Who Made a Religion Out of Greed and Wrecked the Economy
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
Och här Aaron Rouso (idag död fö) som kom i kontakt med Rockefeller Jr i samband med att han kandiderade som Guvernör:
Aaron Russo: Rockefeller knew about 9/11 well in advance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZjKKUEHTKk&feature=related
Men nu kanske det börjar att dra ihop sig?
Webster Tarpley: Bankers in slump plot against euro to save dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRFII9AiQc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DvYH9QiWdPQ&feature=rec-LGOUT-real_rn-1r-3-HM
Här Tarpley böcker om Obama:
Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)by Webster Griffin Tarpley http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/0930852915/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b
Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)by Webster Griffin Tarpley
http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/0930852893/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MouUJNG8f2k&feature=related
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-KJCMWcoms&feature=related
Zbigniew Brzezinski, tidigare Jimmy Carters National Security Advisor och tillsammans med David Rockefeller grundare av den sk Trilateral Commission har vi talat om tidigare är idag den verkliga makten bakom USAs nye president Obama.
Brzezinski representerar intressen som strävar efter att införa en ny världsordning där en centraliserad administration, en centralbank, en världs valuta och globalt ledarskap är kopplat till ett informations system där alla världsmedborgare är sammanlänkade mha informations teknik (RFID) till ett globalt informations system.
Låter detta som total nonsens? Konspiratoriska fantasier lätta att helt avfärda? Läs då Brzezinskis bok från 1980:
Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era
http://www.amazon.com/Between-Two-Ages-Americas-Technetronic/dp/0313234981
där han bla skriver följande:
”The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."
Ett annat citat man hittar I samma bok som alltså skrevs nu mer än 30 år sedan:
”Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.”
Och här en presentation där en annan av Brezinkys böcker "The Grand Chessboard" diskuteras:
Mike Ruppert discusses Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard
http://www.videosift.com/video/Ruppert-talk-on-Brzezinskis-The-Grand-Chessboard
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives (Paperback)by Zbigniew Brzezinski
http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Chessboard-American-Geostrategic-Imperatives/dp/0465027261/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1236020265&sr=1-2
Och notera att när Brzezinski talar om "behovet" av ett nytt Pearl Harbour så kanske de flesta tänker i termer av militära aktioner eller terror attentat. Men det går natuligtvis lika bra med finansiella instrument. Se här vilken skada man kan åstakomma med helt oreglerade derivat och vilken politisk röra som blir konsekvensen. "Order out of caos"?
Taibbi: The Lunatics Who Made a Religion Out of Greed and Wrecked the Economy
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
Och här Aaron Rouso (idag död fö) som kom i kontakt med Rockefeller Jr i samband med att han kandiderade som Guvernör:
Aaron Russo: Rockefeller knew about 9/11 well in advance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZjKKUEHTKk&feature=related
Men nu kanske det börjar att dra ihop sig?
Webster Tarpley: Bankers in slump plot against euro to save dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRFII9AiQc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DvYH9QiWdPQ&feature=rec-LGOUT-real_rn-1r-3-HM
Här Tarpley böcker om Obama:
Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)by Webster Griffin Tarpley http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/0930852915/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b
Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)by Webster Griffin Tarpley
http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/0930852893/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b
Konka och börja om med rena fina böcker
Det bästa för Grekerna är nu helt sonika att ställa in betalningarna gå i konkurs och börja om från början. Inget konstigt med det och detta är något som hänt alla länder utom 6 tidigare. Tom kärnapen nationer har på detta sättet konkat (se Ryssland under dess senaste valutakris).
Det som skulle hända om Grekerna på detta sätt löser alla sina finansiella problem är bara att ffa Tyska och Franska banker åker på en rejäl kredit smäll och att dessa länder där då kanske måste ut med nya åtgärder, stödpaket för att hålla sina banker under armarna.
Sedan är ju Grekerna inte ensamma om att ha problem. Allt fokus just nu på PIIGS men problemen är betydligt större för England, japan och USA. I synnerhet om man tar hänsyn även till de sk off balance skulderna dvs de som aldrig officielt redovisas.
http://www.businessinsider.com/socgen-how-the-worlds-central-bankers-are-about-to-make-the-next-big-policy-mistake-2010-2#off-vs-on-balance-sheet-assets-9
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Ballooning debt is likely to force several countries to default and the U.S. to cut spending, according to Harvard University Professor Kenneth Rogoff, who in 2008 predicted the failure of big American banks.
The U.S. is likely to tighten monetary policy before cutting government spending, sending “shockwaves” through financial markets, Rogoff said in an interview after the speech. Fiscal policy won’t be curbed until soaring bond yields trigger “very painful” tax increases and spending cuts, he said.
Investors will eventually demand higher interest rates to lend to countries around the world that have accumulated debt, including the U.S., he said. The IMF forecast in November that gross U.S. borrowings will amount to the equivalent of 99.5 percent of annual economic output in 2011. The U.K.’s will reach 94.1 percent and Japan’s will spiral to 204.3 percent.
“In rich countries -- Germany, the United States and maybe Japan -- we are going to see slow growth. They will tighten their belts when the problem hits with interest rates,” Rogoff said at the forum, which was hosted by CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets, a unit of Credit Agricole SA, France’s largest retail bank. Japanese fiscal policy is “out of control,” he said.
Greece’s debt totaled 298.5 billion euros ($405 billion) at the end of 2009, according to the Finance Ministry. That’s more than five times more than Russia owed when it defaulted in 1998 and Argentina when it missed payments in 2001.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aI8fxn.J_Fs4
In their brilliant book, This Time Is Different (we´ve plugged it before), Reinhart and Rogoff do not have Britain in their very short list of six nations that have never defaulted (New Zealand, Australia, Thailand, Denmark, Canada and the USA). There are (at least?) two instances of the UK defaulting.
http://www.bondvigilantes.co.uk/blog/2010/02/02/1265121060000.html
Man skulle i så fall även passa på att låta alla skulder rensas från alla dessa länders böcker och de banker som inte klararr sig får gå under med JP Morgan, Goldman & Sachs och andra rent kriminella element i spetsen.
The SEC's lawsuit against Goldman Sachs is a chance to prevent greed without limits.
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
Sedan med de stora bankerna konkursade så kan alla de idag dugliga mindre finansiella insitutioner och banker som skött sig få mer luft under vingarna precis så som det ska fungera i en marknadsekonomi där inneffektiva oproduktiva och tom skadliga inslag rensas bort och ersätt av något bättre.
I Seveige skulle vi ex då slippa SEB, Wallenbergarna och Swedbank i ett slag och i USA skulle JP Morgan, Rockefeller och Goldman & Sachs kunna förpassas till historiens skräphögar som utdöda dinosaurier som haft sin tid.
Isället skulle vi kunna användra pengarna från den riktiga ekonomin till att återrestaurera miljön, (inte banker) inte minst runt meddelhavet med aggresiva satsningar på ett lånsiktigt hållbart jordbruk inspirerat av Keit Lierre och Joe Salatins ideer och metoder.
Dessutom med det nuvarande inneffektiva resursallokeringen av vår ekonomi orsakt av de finansiella drakarna i spillror kan man lägga ned hela försvarindustrin världen över och istället se till att alla människor klotet runt får tillräcklig mat och changs till riktig själslig och materiell utveckling.
Låt oss alla meditera med denna målbild i sinnet from nu!
Det som skulle hända om Grekerna på detta sätt löser alla sina finansiella problem är bara att ffa Tyska och Franska banker åker på en rejäl kredit smäll och att dessa länder där då kanske måste ut med nya åtgärder, stödpaket för att hålla sina banker under armarna.
Sedan är ju Grekerna inte ensamma om att ha problem. Allt fokus just nu på PIIGS men problemen är betydligt större för England, japan och USA. I synnerhet om man tar hänsyn även till de sk off balance skulderna dvs de som aldrig officielt redovisas.
http://www.businessinsider.com/socgen-how-the-worlds-central-bankers-are-about-to-make-the-next-big-policy-mistake-2010-2#off-vs-on-balance-sheet-assets-9
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Ballooning debt is likely to force several countries to default and the U.S. to cut spending, according to Harvard University Professor Kenneth Rogoff, who in 2008 predicted the failure of big American banks.
The U.S. is likely to tighten monetary policy before cutting government spending, sending “shockwaves” through financial markets, Rogoff said in an interview after the speech. Fiscal policy won’t be curbed until soaring bond yields trigger “very painful” tax increases and spending cuts, he said.
Investors will eventually demand higher interest rates to lend to countries around the world that have accumulated debt, including the U.S., he said. The IMF forecast in November that gross U.S. borrowings will amount to the equivalent of 99.5 percent of annual economic output in 2011. The U.K.’s will reach 94.1 percent and Japan’s will spiral to 204.3 percent.
“In rich countries -- Germany, the United States and maybe Japan -- we are going to see slow growth. They will tighten their belts when the problem hits with interest rates,” Rogoff said at the forum, which was hosted by CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets, a unit of Credit Agricole SA, France’s largest retail bank. Japanese fiscal policy is “out of control,” he said.
Greece’s debt totaled 298.5 billion euros ($405 billion) at the end of 2009, according to the Finance Ministry. That’s more than five times more than Russia owed when it defaulted in 1998 and Argentina when it missed payments in 2001.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aI8fxn.J_Fs4
In their brilliant book, This Time Is Different (we´ve plugged it before), Reinhart and Rogoff do not have Britain in their very short list of six nations that have never defaulted (New Zealand, Australia, Thailand, Denmark, Canada and the USA). There are (at least?) two instances of the UK defaulting.
http://www.bondvigilantes.co.uk/blog/2010/02/02/1265121060000.html
Man skulle i så fall även passa på att låta alla skulder rensas från alla dessa länders böcker och de banker som inte klararr sig får gå under med JP Morgan, Goldman & Sachs och andra rent kriminella element i spetsen.
The SEC's lawsuit against Goldman Sachs is a chance to prevent greed without limits.
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
Sedan med de stora bankerna konkursade så kan alla de idag dugliga mindre finansiella insitutioner och banker som skött sig få mer luft under vingarna precis så som det ska fungera i en marknadsekonomi där inneffektiva oproduktiva och tom skadliga inslag rensas bort och ersätt av något bättre.
I Seveige skulle vi ex då slippa SEB, Wallenbergarna och Swedbank i ett slag och i USA skulle JP Morgan, Rockefeller och Goldman & Sachs kunna förpassas till historiens skräphögar som utdöda dinosaurier som haft sin tid.
Isället skulle vi kunna användra pengarna från den riktiga ekonomin till att återrestaurera miljön, (inte banker) inte minst runt meddelhavet med aggresiva satsningar på ett lånsiktigt hållbart jordbruk inspirerat av Keit Lierre och Joe Salatins ideer och metoder.
Dessutom med det nuvarande inneffektiva resursallokeringen av vår ekonomi orsakt av de finansiella drakarna i spillror kan man lägga ned hela försvarindustrin världen över och istället se till att alla människor klotet runt får tillräcklig mat och changs till riktig själslig och materiell utveckling.
Låt oss alla meditera med denna målbild i sinnet from nu!
Taibbi: The Lunatics Who Made a Religion Out of Greed and Wrecked the Economy
The SEC's lawsuit against Goldman Sachs is a chance to prevent greed without limits.
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
http://www.alternet.org/story/146611/taibbi:_the_lunatics_who_made_a_religion_out_of_greed_and_wrecked_the_economy__?page=1
MACRO-EUROPE: The Titanic is SINKING
The Titanic is sinking, and ultimately, ALL passengers will go down with the ship, including Portugal, Spain, Greece, and several other Maastricht Treaty debt-deficit offenders.
http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/john_mauldins_outside_the_box/archive/2010/04/28/macro-europe-the-titanic-is-sinking.aspx
Alltid lika intressant i alla analyser gjorda av "anglo-saxer" är att man glömmer helt och fullständigt bort att se hur situationen nu ser ut i England och USA.
Det är Britterna som är det stora problemet
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2010/03/det-ar-britterna-som-ar-det-stora.html
Gömställen finns inte inför den stora kollapsen
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2009/04/gomstallen-finns-inte-infor-den-stora.html
Sedan finns det inte en tydlig politisk agenda bakom allt detta?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRFII9AiQc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DvYH9QiWdPQ&feature=rec-LGOUT-real_rn-1r-3-HM
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-eurasia-och-brzezinski.html
http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/john_mauldins_outside_the_box/archive/2010/04/28/macro-europe-the-titanic-is-sinking.aspx
Alltid lika intressant i alla analyser gjorda av "anglo-saxer" är att man glömmer helt och fullständigt bort att se hur situationen nu ser ut i England och USA.
Det är Britterna som är det stora problemet
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2010/03/det-ar-britterna-som-ar-det-stora.html
Gömställen finns inte inför den stora kollapsen
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2009/04/gomstallen-finns-inte-infor-den-stora.html
Sedan finns det inte en tydlig politisk agenda bakom allt detta?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRFII9AiQc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DvYH9QiWdPQ&feature=rec-LGOUT-real_rn-1r-3-HM
http://intheendwerealldebt.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-eurasia-och-brzezinski.html
tisdag 27 april 2010
AFA
Båten har nu som bekant gett sig iväg i Lördags efter mer än tre års väntan och samplingen är i gång. Om ca 10-15dagar kommer första del resultaten och om ytterligare ca 30 dagar kommer andra delresultaten.
Ca juni/augusti sedan kommer den officiella 43-101 klassningen. Mycket på gång således.
Vill man veta mer om potentialen kan ni igen ögna igenom nedanstående. Värderingen 0.4 cents per carat hittar ni i bifogad AFA presentation nedan. Själv räknar jag nu kallt med 6 m carat dvs motsvarande en framtida värdering på AFA av över C$2.
Lägg sedan till allt detta nu det faktum att allt fler börjar att inse att vi nu faktiskt nått peak prioduktion av on shore diamond mining och att nu efterrågan på dessa ädla stenar komemr att öka i förhållande till en dessutom minskande framtida tillgång.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/dab364d8-509e-11df-bc86-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2Fdab364d8-509e-11df-bc86-00144feab49a.html%3Fcatid%3D20%26SID%3Dgoogle&SID=google&_i_referer=&catid=20
Dels kommer detta att ge en ännu bättre potentiel framtida kalkyl värderingmässigt för AFA för de fyndigheter man bevisar och dessutom och givet att man nu är så framkörda vad gäller produktion, myndighets kontakter, admininstration osv off shore så sitter man nu på en unik position att utöka sin exploatering och framtida produktion nu inom vad som eg kanske är världens mest intressanta diamant off shore potential dvs utanför Namibias kust.
DeBeers/Namdebs find at Atlantic 1 that AFAs Cheif geologist was instrumental in finding is considered to be a 100 m carats find. The total area is some 5 times larger than AFAs block J but these two areas (A1 and Block J) seems to be very alike in terms of geological structure and apperance according to Mr Forster. That is the guy that was involved in finding A1 as well as now is AFAs cheif geologis. He - if anyone - should know.
Then of course we need to realize that the sampling area we getting in to not only is DEEPER and thus gives us the following potential vs the earlier made sampling:
"AFAs most recent 43-101 report has established a potential ranging from 0.7 million to 1.8 million carats on 35% of the mineralized area."
NB the above sampling was made on a 12.3 km2 area and that there in addition to this is some 15 km2 area in Block J that in fact also very likely contains diamonds.
Now as we in this third sampling with the new state of the art vessle are capable of digging much deeper (down to 12 meters) than what was possible in sampling two (only two meters) - and down to where the most important layers are (6 meters down) and in fact - this is what CEO Mr Leveille had to say about the potential:
"It is recorded in the industry and has happen to every company that the first sampling with a light tool has only touch the surface and then when they came back with a more powerful tool, they normally increase the grade by 2 to 4 times. "
So in a real normal case we now can expect a new range of in between 1.4 and all the way up to 7.4 Mcp.
But then Mr Leveille goes on to say:
"We have seen some specific case in specific areas where the grades have gone up by 20 times. However the general rule is 2 to 4 times.’’
Given all of the above gives me reason to beleive a find of at least 6M carats should not be entierly unlikely. That is simply because I do not think Block J is a normal case and that it may proove to have a significantely higher potential than an average find.
Thus and in a best possible case scenario - if A1 and Block J would show to be identical in terms of scoope, potentialn etc - then we could end up with even a 20 M carats find at Block J.
But in addition to all of this we then also need to consider that the new sampling we´re abvout ton enbark upon is larger as the first NR 43-101 sampling was made on an area totaling 12.3 km2 . The new sapling area we´re now to start however is an an area of 22 km2 or almost a 100% increase.
"The sampling program on Block J will cover Features 6, 8, 17 and 19 covering seven Geological Zones and will comprise a total of 332 samples. Of these, 271 are sited within delineated targets covering 19.6 square kilometres. The remaining 61 samples are designed to test geological formations that are thought to be potentially diamond bearing, but have not yet been proved as such. Approximately 22 square kilometres will be examined by future programs of detailed geophysics, vibracoring, and evaluation sampling. The aim of the complete surveying and sampling program is to delineate diamond resources on Afri-Can´s Block J marine diamond concession in Namibia in compliance with National Instrument 43-101."
So choose you pick and sure there is room for speculation here. With a potential of anything in between 3 m to 20 m carats in Block J I guess anyones pick may have the potential to be the right one.
Operating profit assumptions per share (based on the current number of shares issued of 177 Million and on 70% owners hip of the concession) CDN $ 0.40
http://www.afri-can.com/files/ssparagraph/f761707200/presentation_summary_march_2_2010.pdf
SP valualtion based on an assumtion of:
1 milion carats - C$ 0.40
2 milion carats - C 0.80
3 milion carats - C$ 1.2
4 milion carats - C$ 1.6
5 milion carats - C$ 2
6 milion carats - C$ 2.4
7 milion carats - C$ 2.8
8 milion carats - C$ 3.2
9 milion carats - C$ 3.6
10 milion carats - C$ 4
20 milion carats - C$ 8
Ca juni/augusti sedan kommer den officiella 43-101 klassningen. Mycket på gång således.
Vill man veta mer om potentialen kan ni igen ögna igenom nedanstående. Värderingen 0.4 cents per carat hittar ni i bifogad AFA presentation nedan. Själv räknar jag nu kallt med 6 m carat dvs motsvarande en framtida värdering på AFA av över C$2.
Lägg sedan till allt detta nu det faktum att allt fler börjar att inse att vi nu faktiskt nått peak prioduktion av on shore diamond mining och att nu efterrågan på dessa ädla stenar komemr att öka i förhållande till en dessutom minskande framtida tillgång.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/dab364d8-509e-11df-bc86-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2Fdab364d8-509e-11df-bc86-00144feab49a.html%3Fcatid%3D20%26SID%3Dgoogle&SID=google&_i_referer=&catid=20
Dels kommer detta att ge en ännu bättre potentiel framtida kalkyl värderingmässigt för AFA för de fyndigheter man bevisar och dessutom och givet att man nu är så framkörda vad gäller produktion, myndighets kontakter, admininstration osv off shore så sitter man nu på en unik position att utöka sin exploatering och framtida produktion nu inom vad som eg kanske är världens mest intressanta diamant off shore potential dvs utanför Namibias kust.
DeBeers/Namdebs find at Atlantic 1 that AFAs Cheif geologist was instrumental in finding is considered to be a 100 m carats find. The total area is some 5 times larger than AFAs block J but these two areas (A1 and Block J) seems to be very alike in terms of geological structure and apperance according to Mr Forster. That is the guy that was involved in finding A1 as well as now is AFAs cheif geologis. He - if anyone - should know.
Then of course we need to realize that the sampling area we getting in to not only is DEEPER and thus gives us the following potential vs the earlier made sampling:
"AFAs most recent 43-101 report has established a potential ranging from 0.7 million to 1.8 million carats on 35% of the mineralized area."
NB the above sampling was made on a 12.3 km2 area and that there in addition to this is some 15 km2 area in Block J that in fact also very likely contains diamonds.
Now as we in this third sampling with the new state of the art vessle are capable of digging much deeper (down to 12 meters) than what was possible in sampling two (only two meters) - and down to where the most important layers are (6 meters down) and in fact - this is what CEO Mr Leveille had to say about the potential:
"It is recorded in the industry and has happen to every company that the first sampling with a light tool has only touch the surface and then when they came back with a more powerful tool, they normally increase the grade by 2 to 4 times. "
So in a real normal case we now can expect a new range of in between 1.4 and all the way up to 7.4 Mcp.
But then Mr Leveille goes on to say:
"We have seen some specific case in specific areas where the grades have gone up by 20 times. However the general rule is 2 to 4 times.’’
Given all of the above gives me reason to beleive a find of at least 6M carats should not be entierly unlikely. That is simply because I do not think Block J is a normal case and that it may proove to have a significantely higher potential than an average find.
Thus and in a best possible case scenario - if A1 and Block J would show to be identical in terms of scoope, potentialn etc - then we could end up with even a 20 M carats find at Block J.
But in addition to all of this we then also need to consider that the new sampling we´re abvout ton enbark upon is larger as the first NR 43-101 sampling was made on an area totaling 12.3 km2 . The new sapling area we´re now to start however is an an area of 22 km2 or almost a 100% increase.
"The sampling program on Block J will cover Features 6, 8, 17 and 19 covering seven Geological Zones and will comprise a total of 332 samples. Of these, 271 are sited within delineated targets covering 19.6 square kilometres. The remaining 61 samples are designed to test geological formations that are thought to be potentially diamond bearing, but have not yet been proved as such. Approximately 22 square kilometres will be examined by future programs of detailed geophysics, vibracoring, and evaluation sampling. The aim of the complete surveying and sampling program is to delineate diamond resources on Afri-Can´s Block J marine diamond concession in Namibia in compliance with National Instrument 43-101."
So choose you pick and sure there is room for speculation here. With a potential of anything in between 3 m to 20 m carats in Block J I guess anyones pick may have the potential to be the right one.
Operating profit assumptions per share (based on the current number of shares issued of 177 Million and on 70% owners hip of the concession) CDN $ 0.40
http://www.afri-can.com/files/ssparagraph/f761707200/presentation_summary_march_2_2010.pdf
SP valualtion based on an assumtion of:
1 milion carats - C$ 0.40
2 milion carats - C 0.80
3 milion carats - C$ 1.2
4 milion carats - C$ 1.6
5 milion carats - C$ 2
6 milion carats - C$ 2.4
7 milion carats - C$ 2.8
8 milion carats - C$ 3.2
9 milion carats - C$ 3.6
10 milion carats - C$ 4
20 milion carats - C$ 8
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer (Atom)